Match the family
A party shows up. Pick its political family from the four offered. Tests whether you can read a party's name and country and instantly land it in the right tradition.
just for fun
Games
A small set of quizzes drawn from the same source-cited entities the rest of the site uses. Each game picks a question at random; your lifetime totals live in your browser. No leaderboards, no logins. Nothing decreases on a wrong answer — milestones (bronze → silver → gold → platinum → diamond) accumulate as your correct count crosses 5, 10, 25, 50, 100.
Whose position?
A one-line description of a party or politician's core platform. Pick whose it is from four candidates. Clue is verbatim from the dataset's short-description field, with proper-noun identifiers blanked out.
Who said it?
A real quote, with date and context. Four candidate speakers. Quotes are source-cited like every other Tayyar entity, so the answer is verifiable.
Find the divergence
A party's declared position on an axis is shown. Pick the actual behavioral score from four candidates. Tests whether you can read which way a party's rhetoric and record diverge — and by how much.
Head to head
Two parties and one axis. Pick which sits further toward a named pole. The only game that tests the actual scores behind the compass — checked against the published number, not a label.
Ask the panel
Paste any political quote. A panel of free language models each guesses who in MENA politics said it, and every guess links back to its Tayyar page. Stump mode pulls a real quote and scores which model is sharpest.
Live — not scored
What these games are not
They are not a measurement of political knowledge, and getting questions wrong doesn't reflect on you — it reflects on how the dataset has classified an actor. Some classifications are judgement calls. The dataset's methodology page documents where the lines are drawn. The games inherit the dataset's calls, including the open judgement calls the methodology flags.