axes catalog

Axes catalog

Every dimension Tayyar scores parties on. The two compass axes drive the default plot; the 14 issue axes appear on every party's spider chart and have their own deep-dive page each.

The means, ranges, extremes, and correlations below are properties of the v0.2 reliability scaffolding — hand-coded estimates, not settled measurements. See the methodology.

Compass axes

The default 2-axis projection on the home page.

Economic

Statist ← → Market

Degree to which the actor favors market mechanisms (positive) vs. state allocation (negative).

Mean
-0.67
Range
-9.0 → 8.0
Scored
83 parties
Most Market: Free Egyptians Party 8.0
Most Statist: PFLP -9.0

Social

Authority ← → Libertarian

Personal and moral social freedom — lifestyle, LGBTQ+ rights, individual expression, religion-in-private — permissive (+) vs traditional collective moral authority (−). This axis is about SOCIAL / MORAL liberty, NOT security policy, nationalism, or economics: a party can be nationalist-hawkish yet socially permissive (secular nationalists), or dovish yet socially conservative.

Mean
-1.41
Range
-9.0 → 8.0
Scored
83 parties
Most Libertarian: The Democrats 8.0
Most Authority: United Torah Judaism -9.0

Correlation matrix

Pearson r between every axis pair across all 83 parties in the dataset. Read it as: red cells are pairs of axes that move together (a party with a high score on one tends to have a high score on the other); blue cells are pairs that move opposite. The diagonal is always 1 by construction. The brighter the cell, the stronger the relationship.

EconomicSocialState & religionLiberal democracyWest alignmentRegional stancePalestinian questionCivil libertiesRegime stancePan-Arab vs particularistCentralism vs federalismTraditionalism vs modernizationGender equalityIran posturePress freedomSectarian power-sharing
Economic +1.00 -0.19 -0.19 -0.04 +0.76 +0.69 -0.45 -0.12 +0.47 -0.63 -0.03 +0.07 +0.08 -0.80 +0.01 -0.17
Social -0.19 +1.00 +0.95 +0.76 +0.17 +0.24 +0.12 +0.80 -0.04 +0.14 +0.21 +0.91 +0.98 -0.27 +0.88 +0.14
State & religion -0.19 +0.95 +1.00 +0.66 +0.15 +0.21 +0.12 +0.70 -0.01 +0.05 +0.25 +0.91 +0.97 -0.29 +0.85 +0.08
Liberal democracy -0.04 +0.76 +0.66 +1.00 +0.21 +0.25 +0.18 +0.97 -0.16 +0.16 +0.37 +0.68 +0.82 -0.42 +0.97 +0.15
West alignment +0.76 +0.17 +0.15 +0.21 +1.00 +0.96 -0.56 +0.14 +0.62 -0.56 +0.07 +0.37 +0.50 -0.82 +0.54 -0.15
Regional stance +0.69 +0.24 +0.21 +0.25 +0.96 +1.00 -0.52 +0.18 +0.57 -0.56 +0.10 +0.38 +0.45 -0.86 +0.46 -0.00
Palestinian question -0.45 +0.12 +0.12 +0.18 -0.56 -0.52 +1.00 +0.16 -0.48 +0.72 +0.06 +0.05 +0.02 +0.72 -0.04 +0.24
Civil liberties -0.12 +0.80 +0.70 +0.97 +0.14 +0.18 +0.16 +1.00 -0.22 +0.19 +0.38 +0.71 +0.87 -0.40 +0.99 +0.12
Regime stance +0.47 -0.04 -0.01 -0.16 +0.62 +0.57 -0.48 -0.22 +1.00 -0.26 -0.27 +0.12 +0.31 -0.53 +0.25 -0.15
Pan-Arab vs particularist -0.63 +0.14 +0.05 +0.16 -0.56 -0.56 +0.72 +0.19 -0.26 +1.00 -0.27 -0.05 +0.03 +0.43 +0.09 +0.30
Centralism vs federalism -0.03 +0.21 +0.25 +0.37 +0.07 +0.10 +0.06 +0.38 -0.27 -0.27 +1.00 +0.22 +0.50 -0.01 +0.59 -0.28
Traditionalism vs modernization +0.07 +0.91 +0.91 +0.68 +0.37 +0.38 +0.05 +0.71 +0.12 -0.05 +0.22 +1.00 +0.97 -0.34 +0.83 +0.10
Gender equality +0.08 +0.98 +0.97 +0.82 +0.50 +0.45 +0.02 +0.87 +0.31 +0.03 +0.50 +0.97 +1.00 -0.43 +0.86 +1.00
Iran posture -0.80 -0.27 -0.29 -0.42 -0.82 -0.86 +0.72 -0.40 -0.53 +0.43 -0.01 -0.34 -0.43 +1.00 -0.51 -0.46
Press freedom +0.01 +0.88 +0.85 +0.97 +0.54 +0.46 -0.04 +0.99 +0.25 +0.09 +0.59 +0.83 +0.86 -0.51 +1.00 +1.00
Sectarian power-sharing -0.17 +0.14 +0.08 +0.15 -0.15 -0.00 +0.24 +0.12 -0.15 +0.30 -0.28 +0.10 +1.00 -0.46 +1.00 +1.00

Strongest correlations

Pairs that travel together hardest. Many of these reflect a single underlying cleavage (e.g. religion-in-state and palestinian-question both load onto a regional Islamist–secular axis).

Most independent

Pairs that carry separate information. These axes are doing distinct explanatory work — knowing a party's score on one doesn't tell you its score on the other.

Issue axes

Drive the spider chart on every party page. Pick any pair for the compass via the dropdowns on the compass.

Liberal democracy

Weak/anti ← → Strong commitment

Commitment to LIBERAL democracy — independent courts, free press, opposition and minority rights, limits on executive power. NOT mere electoral participation: a party that contests elections but works to weaken the judiciary, entrench ethnic or religious supremacy, or curb minority and dissident rights scores LOW (−). Strong commitment to liberal-democratic checks scores HIGH (+).

Mean
+0.35
Range
-9.0 → 8.5
Scored
83 parties
Most Strong commitment: The Democrats 8.5
Most Weak/anti: Ba'ath Party (Syria) -9.0

West alignment

Anti-Western ← → Pro-Western

STRATEGIC and security alignment with Western (US/EU) blocs — military cooperation, diplomatic partnership, trade. This is geopolitical orientation, NOT cultural affinity for liberal Western values: a religious-nationalist party can be strongly pro-Western strategically (wants US arms and backing) while rejecting Western liberal social values. Score the strategic posture. Pro-Western (+), anti-Western or hostile-nonaligned (−).

Mean
+0.58
Range
-10.0 → 8.5
Scored
81 parties
Most Pro-Western: National Unity 8.5
Most Anti-Western: Palestinian Islamic Jihad -10.0

Regional stance

Resistance/maximalist ← → Stability/normalization

Posture toward the regional order: the "Axis of Resistance" (Iran–Hezbollah–Hamas–Houthis, anti-normalization, armed struggle) at the negative pole vs the normalization / stability camp (Abraham Accords, Gulf–Israel détente, negotiated settlement) at the positive pole. Pro-Palestinian sympathy ALONE does not make an actor "resistance" — score toward resistance (−) only for alignment with armed-resistance or anti-normalization politics; an actor that pursues its regional aims THROUGH negotiation and normalization leans positive (+).

Mean
-0.28
Range
-10.0 → 7.0
Scored
82 parties
Most Stability/normalization: National Unity 7.0
Most Resistance/maximalist: Palestinian Islamic Jihad -10.0

Palestinian question

Opposed ← → Pro-Palestinian rights

Position on Palestinian rights, statehood, and self-determination — strong support (positive) vs. opposition (negative).

Mean
+5.73
Range
-10.0 → 10.0
Scored
83 parties
Most Pro-Palestinian rights: Balad 10.0
Most Opposed: Otzma Yehudit -10.0

Civil liberties

Restrict ← → Expand

Speech, protest, dissent, association, press freedom — expand and protect (positive) vs. restrict (negative).

Mean
-0.05
Range
-9.0 → 9.0
Scored
81 parties
Most Expand: Hadash 9.0
Most Restrict: Ba'ath Party (Syria) -9.0

Regime stance

anti-regime ← → pro-regime

Stance toward the state's foundational constitutional order — for Israel the Zionist-democratic state; for republics and monarchies the existing political order. Pro-regime (+) accepts and defends that order; anti-regime (−) rejects or seeks to overturn it. This measures stance toward the FOUNDATIONAL ORDER, not the incumbent government: an opposition party loyal to the constitutional order still scores positive.

Mean
+2.11
Range
-9.0 → 10.0
Scored
78 parties
Most pro-regime: Ba'ath Party (Syria) 10.0
Most anti-regime: Palestinian Islamic Jihad -9.0

Pan-Arab vs particularist

particularist ← → pan-Arab

Degree to which the actor frames its politics around pan-Arab solidarity (the Nasserist, Baathist, and contemporary anti-normalization tradition) versus country- or community-specific particularism (sectarian, ethnic, monarchic, or nation-state-first frames). One of the major regional cleavages.

Mean
+0.84
Range
-9.0 → 9.8
Scored
66 parties
Most pan-Arab: Ba'ath Party (Syria) 9.8
Most particularist: Patriotic Union of Kurdistan -9.0

Centralism vs federalism

centralist ← → federalist

Position on state structure: favoring a strong unitary central state versus power-sharing among regions, sects, or ethnic groups. Salient in MENA where Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan, and Syria have consociational or federal frames while Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco are strongly centralist. Kurdish parties and Yemeni southern movements sit at the federalist extreme.

Mean
-3.56
Range
-9.0 → 9.5
Scored
78 parties
Most federalist: Kurdistan Democratic Party 9.5
Most centralist: Mostaqbal Watan -9.0

Traditionalism vs modernization

traditionalist ← → modernizing

Position on social and institutional modernization versus tradition. Captures stance on issues like womens rights, religious authority in public life, reform of family law, openness to technological and economic transformation. Distinct from the secular-religious axis: an actor can be religious and modernizing (Vision 2030) or secular and traditionalist (state-corporatist nationalism).

Mean
+1.24
Range
-9.0 → 7.5
Scored
78 parties
Most modernizing: The Democrats 7.5
Most traditionalist: Noam -9.0

Gender equality

Patriarchal traditionalism ← → Gender equality

Position on women's rights, gender roles in public life, family law (personal status, divorce, custody, inheritance), and political representation. Distinct from the broader modernization axis: a party can be tech-modernizing and gender-conservative.

Mean
-2.95
Range
-9.0 → 8.0
Scored
22 parties
Most Gender equality: The Democrats 8.0
Most Patriarchal traditionalism: United Torah Judaism -9.0

Iran posture

Anti-Iran / adversarial ← → Pro-Iran / aligned

Position toward the Islamic Republic of Iran as a regional actor: alliance, hostility, or neutrality. Independent from West alignment — a party can be anti-Western AND anti-Iran (most Sunni Salafi groups), or pro-Western AND anti-Iran (Saudi, UAE, post-1979 Israel), or anti-Western AND pro-Iran (Hezbollah, Houthis, post-2003 Iraqi Shia parties).

Mean
-1.63
Range
-10.0 → 10.0
Scored
19 parties
Most Pro-Iran / aligned: Hezbollah 10.0
Most Anti-Iran / adversarial: Otzma Yehudit -10.0

Press freedom

State-controlled press ← → Free press

Position on journalism, broadcast media, and digital information access. Distinct from broader civil liberties: a regime can selectively restrict press while allowing other forms of speech (or vice versa). Captures both legal frameworks (defamation law, licensing, internet shutdowns) and political enforcement.

Mean
-2.45
Range
-9.0 → 8.0
Scored
21 parties
Most Free press: The Democrats 8.0
Most State-controlled press: Ansar Allah (Houthis) -9.0

Sectarian power-sharing

Consociational / quota system ← → Post-sectarian / civic state

Position on confessional or sectarian political organisation: Lebanese-style consociational quotas, Iraqi muhasasa, Syrian Alawite-network governance, vs post-sectarian / civic-state framings. Relevant primarily to Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Bahrain; less so to Egypt or Saudi Arabia where the question does not structurally arise.

Mean
-4.45
Range
-7.0 → 4.0
Scored
11 parties
Most Post-sectarian / civic state: Sairoon Alliance 4.0
Most Consociational / quota system: State of Law Coalition -7.0